New research. Smarter equipment. Evidence before hype.
Explore developments in smoke cleanup and assessment, with clear labels for research, established methods and manufacturer claims.
Sources reviewed November 12, 2026 · Selected research & technology
Research
Promising findings and prototypes. We explain the setting and what has not yet been proven.
Product watch
Equipment features from manufacturers, clearly separated from independent performance evidence.
Guidance & standards
Practical context for filtration, monitoring and professional restoration decisions.
An educational technology watch, not a claim that Smoke Restore owns or uses this equipment, an endorsement of a vendor, or a guarantee of safety.
Explore the developments
ResearchAugust 19, 2026
Air-cleaner placement matters as much as capacity.
NIST test-house research found that air movement between rooms affects smoke-particle removal. Multiple portable cleaners improved performance; sizing a unit only for its room can be inadequate when air circulates through the whole house.
Why it matters
A remediation plan should account for airflow and infiltration, not only the rating on the box.
What it does not establish
Controlled test-house results are not a guarantee for an individual home.
Stanford researchers are testing truck-mounted sensors and collecting smoke samples to develop forecasts of airborne-metal exposure. The project combines field measurements with modeling.
Why it matters
Knowing more about smoke composition could improve exposure assessment and response planning.
What it does not establish
This is a prototype/research project, not a home-clearance device or a current public nationwide toxicity forecast.
Dri-Eaz’s HEPA 700 offers adjustable airflow, remote monitoring and control, and an optional activated-carbon stage. HEPA targets airborne particles; carbon is intended for selected gases and odors.
Why it matters
Remote status and adjustable capacity can support equipment management during professional work.
What it does not establish
These are manufacturer specifications, not independent proof that a building is decontaminated. Air cleaning does not replace surface and source cleanup.
Cold Jet’s Aero2 PCS ULTRA lets operators adjust particle size and save cleaning settings. Dry-ice blasting may be considered for compatible materials in professional restoration.
Why it matters
More controllable settings may help professionals match the process to the material being cleaned.
What it does not establish
Suitability requires testing. Removed contamination still needs collection. Carbon-dioxide accumulation and cold injuries require trained controls. Product features are manufacturer claims.
EPA’s wildfire clean-air challenge highlighted Portland State’s low-cost Cocoon prototype and Metalmark’s self-cleaning filter concept. The program also funded research into new filter materials.
Why it matters
Affordability, maintenance and performance are important problems for long smoke seasons.
What it does not establish
This is research and program history, not confirmation that these prototypes are currently sold or that commercial versions perform identically.
Portable monitors can help track selected pollutants such as PM2.5. Readings can inform when conditions change, but a monitor measures only what its sensors detect.
Why it matters
Trend data can be useful when considering ventilation and filtration decisions.
What it does not establish
A low particle reading cannot rule out gases, surface residues or every health hazard. Consumer sensors are not comprehensive clearance testing.
Standards watch2025 first edition · revision underway
S700 is evolving.
ANSI/IICRC S700 addresses professional fire and smoke assessment, restoration planning and documentation. IICRC is working on a revision.
Why it matters
Standards help structure professional assessment and communicate the scope of work.
What it does not establish
The current edition does not comprehensively address wildfire situations and environmental hazards. It should not be described as a universal wildfire-clearance standard.
EPA recommends mechanical filtration for smoke particles and does not recommend electronic air cleaners, photocatalytic oxidation, hydroxyl generators or UV-based devices for smoke removal because of performance limitations and possible ozone or other pollutant production.
Why it matters
A new product or a strong odor-removal claim is not enough evidence that an indoor environment is safe.
What it does not establish
This household smoke-exposure guidance is distinct from any specialist unoccupied-building process. Ozone is not a DIY occupied-home smoke treatment.
Educational technology watch, not a claim of equipment ownership, endorsement, a guarantee of safety or a substitute for a property-specific professional assessment. Manufacturer materials are identified. Links do not imply an affiliation with Smoke Restore.
